What’s an Importer to Do About the Chinese (Section 301) Tariffs?
“Knowledge is power.” – Sir Francis Bacon
We couldn’t agree more! Freight is a variable game, but regulatory compliance requires a solid foundation of knowledge and experience. And Shapiro has over a century of that!
- Is your company being affected in some way by the imposition of additional Chinese tariffs under Section 301?
- Will these additional costs cut into your bottom line profitability?
What better time to leverage our vast knowledge and experience than to respond to the rounds of excessive additional Chinese tariffs that have been proposed, that will undoubtedly have a negative impact to your business?
First, Some Background: The Section 301 Tariffs
As you are aware, on July 6, 2018, with the trade war between the US and China looming, the United States Trade Representative (USTR) implemented the imposition of an additional 25% duties on $34 billion on certain Chinese imports that contain “industrially significant technologies,” The finalized list of the 818 products subjected to the new tariffs can be found on the USTR website using this link here.
On June 15, 2018, the USTR subsequently announced a proposed second list of 284 additional subheadings, worth $16 billion, subjected to 25% additional tariffs. The comment period for this list ended July 23, 2018. The finalized list of affected tariffs can be found here. The duties for all but a handful of these tariffs went into effect on August 23rd.
And on July 10th, a third list encompassing 6,031 items, that may be subjected to 10% (or possibly 25%) additional duties and valued at $200 billion, was released. A complete list of the products subjected to the tariffs can be found here on the USTR website. Hearings and the comment period closed on September 6th. It is likely that duties will not go into effect until mid to late September, or later.
What’s an Importer to Do?
- Option 1: File for an Exclusion
You certainly have many justifiable reasons for opposing the tariffs that have been proposed. As an example, up to July 10th, the approach to the 301 tariffs had been to avoid imposing duties on consumer goods. Round 3 changed all of that! While USTR has not yet published anything about the standard that they will use for making an exclusion determination, we believe one of the strongest arguments out there is that the goods are consumer goods. Well, there is a method for fighting back! Please note: At this point, this option is only available for the finalized list (lists 1 and 2).
Shapiro has aligned with a Customs attorney from Thompson Coburn to make the filing process both easy and cost-effective for you. Please reach out to email@example.com for simple-to-use instruction and pricing.
- Option 2: Re-evaluate your Classifications
It is always a good idea to take a second look at how your products are classified— especially with consideration to some binding rulings that are on file. While some classifications are straightforward, others can be very gray. Addressing gray areas can be a difficult exercise; it requires both expert interpretation of the tariff schedule—and oftentimes expert strategies.
Shapiro has a team of licensed tariff experts on staff. Let us review your product classifications to identify associated risks, as well as potential opportunities. Please reach out to firstname.lastname@example.org to get started, and for pricing.
- Option 3: Re-evaluate your Product Designs
Let’s collaborate together! A slight modification to your product may be all that you need in terms of a legal alternative to these unanticipated tariffs. Sometimes all it takes for a tariff adjustment is a very small change in design. Remember, duty rates are determined based on the product’s condition at the time of import. Shapiro has a team of licensed tariff experts on staff. Let us review your product classifications to identify potential opportunities. Please reach out to email@example.com to get started, and for pricing.
- Option 4: Consider Alternate Sourcing
Right now, China is the primary country under “fairness” scrutiny. Certainly, this is subject to change. Is it possible to source your product from another country from which the additional tariffs would not apply?
Shapiro has a team of marketing experts on staff. Let’s discuss your product line and work together to identify other potential sourcing locations. Please reach out to firstname.lastname@example.org to get started, and for pricing.
- Option 5: Consider Drawback
Did you know that commodities subject to Section 301 punitive tariffs remain eligible for duty drawback? While you still are required to outlay a 25% tariff at the time of entry (and while the return will not be immediate), if your company imports and exports, this option may help to mitigate your losses.
Shapiro has a team of licensed tariff experts on staff. Let’s discuss this duty recovery opportunity together. Please reach out to email@example.com to get started, and for pricing.
A Quick Section 301 Reference Chart
First round: 818 HTSUS subheadings
Second round: 284 HTSUS subheadings
Third round: Approximately 5000 HTSUS subheadings
In closing, we wholeheartedly agree, knowledge IS power. Shapiro is a powerful partner. Give us a call. We are here to help!
-- Marjorie Shapiro
Get Shap Blog via Email
We've got you covered - sign up and get the latest blog posts delivered right to your inbox.
- July 2019 (1)
- March 2019 (1)
- December 2018 (1)
- July 2018 (2)
- June 2018 (1)
- April 2018 (1)
- Show All »
- March 2018 (2)
- February 2018 (5)
- January 2018 (2)
- December 2017 (1)
- November 2017 (3)
- October 2017 (2)
- September 2017 (1)
- August 2017 (1)
- July 2017 (1)
- May 2017 (1)
- April 2017 (1)
- March 2017 (2)
- January 2017 (1)
- December 2016 (1)
- October 2016 (1)
- September 2016 (1)
- August 2016 (2)
- July 2016 (1)
- May 2016 (1)
- April 2016 (1)
- February 2016 (2)
- January 2016 (3)
- November 2015 (2)
- September 2015 (1)
- April 2015 (2)
- February 2015 (1)
- January 2015 (1)
- November 2014 (2)
- October 2014 (1)
- September 2014 (1)
- August 2014 (1)
- July 2014 (1)
- June 2014 (2)
- April 2014 (3)
- February 2014 (1)
- January 2014 (2)
- December 2013 (2)
- November 2013 (2)
- October 2013 (1)
- September 2013 (1)
- August 2013 (1)
- July 2013 (1)
- May 2013 (2)